<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design + Direction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dicksonfong.com/2008/05/03/design-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dicksonfong.com/2008/05/03/design-direction/</link>
	<description>Graphic communication. Web implementation.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dickson Fong</title>
		<link>http://www.dicksonfong.com/2008/05/03/design-direction/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickson Fong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 05:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dicksonfong.com/?p=24#comment-78</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Matt:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for the encouragement! 

I think what you're talking about is more along the lines of consistent brand identity than project direction. However, I do agree that some websites can look hobbled together. I think this problem occurs most often when a company has a new promo website that focuses on a new product or service. In many cases, there's a completely different identity that doesn't jive with the existing brand at all. Sometimes, it may be warranted, especially if the product is self-contained, or if the brand is in the process of realigning itself. But, more often than not, I can't help but feel whoever was in charge of designing the website had no regard for the brand at all, and was only interested in aesthetics and self expression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Matt:</strong> Thanks for the encouragement! </p>
<p>I think what you&#8217;re talking about is more along the lines of consistent brand identity than project direction. However, I do agree that some websites can look hobbled together. I think this problem occurs most often when a company has a new promo website that focuses on a new product or service. In many cases, there&#8217;s a completely different identity that doesn&#8217;t jive with the existing brand at all. Sometimes, it may be warranted, especially if the product is self-contained, or if the brand is in the process of realigning itself. But, more often than not, I can&#8217;t help but feel whoever was in charge of designing the website had no regard for the brand at all, and was only interested in aesthetics and self&nbsp;expression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.dicksonfong.com/2008/05/03/design-direction/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dicksonfong.com/?p=24#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Great article Dickson!  I wish more companies (and designers) would consider direction more carefully.   This seems very noticeable for companies who own numerous web sites - and no direction has been established for them...they all end up looking different and clumsy as a whole overview.

Keep up the great articles, they're worth it! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Dickson!  I wish more companies (and designers) would consider direction more carefully.   This seems very noticeable for companies who own numerous web sites - and no direction has been established for them&#8230;they all end up looking different and clumsy as a whole overview.</p>
<p>Keep up the great articles, they&#8217;re worth it!&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
